Why I Hired the "Weaker" Data Scientist (and Never Regretted It)


I once had to choose between two candidates for a data science role.

One had better credentials. The other got the job.

I was hiring for a data science role within my team and we were down to the final two - let’s call them “Amy” and “Ben”.

On paper, Amy was more qualified - she had better credentials than Ben.

But in her final interview, all she kept doing was telling us how great this job would be for her career.

She talked about the skills she’d develop, the experience she’d gain and how it would position her for future opportunities.

I’m not saying that these things are wrong.

In fact, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with discussing career development in an interview - it shows ambition and self-awareness.

The problem was, it was only about her:

How great she was.
How good this job would be for her advancement.

She saw herself as the customer and we were there to sell the job to her, but never explained what we would get in return.

Ben, on the other hand, struck a better balance.

His university grades weren’t as good as Amy’s, but there was something about his approach that suggested real drive.

He’d worked his way up from customer service to data analyst, and had been systematically studying towards a professional certification.

Yes, he talked about his career goals - this job would be a major leap for his career.

More importantly, though, he also took the time to tell us exactly what he would do to benefit us if we hired him.

He made it all about both of us:

What problems he could solve for us.
What value he could create for us.
And how, in providing this value, this role would help his career grow.

We hired Ben because he understood that interviews are a two-way conversation and it was one of the best hiring decisions of my life.

Ben is still at that organisation and has been promoted several times since.

Because Ben understood something Amy didn’t:

You don’t succeed by only telling your stakeholders what you want to gain.

You succeed by also showing them what you can give.

Talk again soon,

Dr Genevieve Hayes

Data Science Impact Algorithm

Twice weekly, I share proven strategies to help data scientists get noticed, promoted, and valued. No theory — just practical steps to transform your technical expertise into business impact and the freedom to call your own shots.

Read more from Data Science Impact Algorithm

You’re already using optimisation every day as a data scientist - but you probably don’t think about it. Every time you train a machine learning model, you’re running an optimisation algorithm to find the best parameters. But there’s a second type of optimisation that most data scientists never even touch - and it’s where the real business value often lives. It’s called decision optimisation, and it can transform your ML predictions into actionable decisions. Here’s the difference: ML...

Data science exists to support decision making, but within any organisation, there is a hierarchy of decisions - low stakes, high volume decisions at the bottom; high stakes, low volume decisions at the top. Executives care most about the decisions at the top. There’s valuable work at the bottom of that hierarchy. But automating routine decisions is about clearing the path so executives can focus on the high-stakes decisions. It’s not about walking it with them. For years, data science has...

Building a data science model for an academic paper is one thing. Building a model that has to work perfectly during the Cricket World Cup with millions watching is something else entirely. There’s no room for the kind of errors that might be acceptable in research settings or even standard business applications. And if you get it wrong, you get emails… Lots of emails… From people all around the world… The type of emails that begin with: “how dare you you make my team lose?!” Worse still? You...