Twice weekly, I share proven strategies to help data scientists get noticed, promoted, and valued. No theory — just practical steps to transform your technical expertise into business impact and the freedom to call your own shots.
The Data Scientist Who Cried "Significance"
|
Why do academic research papers always seem to find something groundbreaking - and data scientists tend to make boring findings sound revolutionary? As an academic turned data scientist, I first felt the pressure to produce "interesting" statistical findings as far back as my honours year. It was my first research project and the capstone to my Bachelors degree. I was determined to make a splash with my debut into the academic world. I imagined publishing my first research paper before starting my first real job. 9 months later, when my ultimate findings showed "no statistically significant evidence" to support my hypothesis, I was devastated. No matter how much my supervisor tried to convince me otherwise, a null result just didn't seem to cut it. Fortunately, I was eventually able to swallow my pride and accept my disappointing findings - which still led to me graduating with a First Class degree. However, a quick Google search is enough to find numerous examples of misleading statistics in academic research. Years later, I discovered I wasn't alone in this struggle. As Nicholas Kelly, author of How to Interpret Data, recently shared with me, there's often pressure in academia to find "interesting" results - leading to statistical analysis that's... let's say... creatively interpreted. The problem, though, is that this erodes trust faster than you can say "p-hacking" and turns you into the researcher who cried "significance". Here's the thing... This same pressure exists in the corporate world. Data scientists feel the need to find something impressive to justify their role, especially when executives keep asking "Why can't ChatGPT just do this?". The temptation to make boring data sound revolutionary is real. Nicholas's advice? Be honest when the data is boring. Trust is your most valuable currency, and once it's gone, you won't get those cool, impactful projects in the future. Nicholas joined me in the latest episode of Value Driven Data Science to tackle the critical challenge of data interpretation. Our conversation reveals:
Ready to transform how you interpret data? 🎧 Listen now on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, or click the link below: Talk again soon, Dr Genevieve Hayes First published: July 2, 2025 |
Data Science Impact Algorithm
Twice weekly, I share proven strategies to help data scientists get noticed, promoted, and valued. No theory — just practical steps to transform your technical expertise into business impact and the freedom to call your own shots.
In a recent blog post, CFO advisor and friend of the list Lauren Pearl discussed the impact of AI on the age-old software “build vs buy” decision. In short, Lauren argued that AI-driven vibe coding has made building software in-house far more appealing when the stakes are low, but when stakes are high, buying is still the way to go. To quote Lauren: “When you buy software, you don’t just buy the code. You buy a support team, expert-derived flows, tested features, platform trust, regular...
Ten years ago, everyone wanted to be doing machine learning. Go to a data conference - someone was presenting on ML. Advertising a data role - just mention ML and applications would 10X. It was the promise of machine learning that inspired an entire generation of data scientists. I know. I was one of them. And then came the statistic that revealed what many data scientists knew but few wanted to admit: around 90% of ML initiatives never made it to deployment. The ideas were there. The...
Last week, I stepped on the fancy scales at my gym for the first time in four months. You know the ones. They don’t just tell you your weight. They tell you your muscle mass, bone density, basal metabolic rate… Basically, everything short of your star sign. The results were horrifying. Everything had gone backwards. I’d even managed to lose 400 grams of muscle. I’d been training five days a week and made no major changes to my diet. I was lifting heavier weights than ever before. None of it...