Twice weekly, I share proven strategies to help data scientists get noticed, promoted, and valued. No theory — just practical steps to transform your technical expertise into business impact and the freedom to call your own shots.
Build vs Buy Just Got Personal
|
In a recent blog post, CFO advisor and friend of the list Lauren Pearl discussed the impact of AI on the age-old software “build vs buy” decision. In short, Lauren argued that AI-driven vibe coding has made building software in-house far more appealing when the stakes are low, but when stakes are high, buying is still the way to go. To quote Lauren: “When you buy software, you don’t just buy the code. You buy a support team, expert-derived flows, tested features, platform trust, regular updates, and it being someone else’s problem when the thing breaks.” Her argument can easily be extended to the provision of data science advice. AI has made it easier than ever for organisations to “build” their own “expert” data advisors. For high-volume, low-stakes situations, this may be the best approach. It’s essentially the principle that’s always driven machine learning adoption. And now AI has amplified the gains created by ML automation, by being able to code and train those models faster than any human ever could. But when the stakes are high, data volumes are too low for ML, and there’s real potential for things to go very wrong - as is the case for many strategic decisions - this is where “buying” human expertise still wins out. To paraphrase Lauren: When you “buy” a human data scientist, you don’t just buy analysis. You buy their support in interpreting that analysis, expert knowledge of the best techniques to use, validated results, trust in the outputs, knowledge of when the work needs updating, and someone to identify the problems when models inevitably break. So, if you’re a data scientist trying to get ahead in an AI-first world, this is what you need to focus on providing - decision support, not just technical outputs. If not, you might find the build vs buy decision suddenly working against you. Talk again soon, Dr Genevieve Hayes |
Data Science Impact Algorithm
Twice weekly, I share proven strategies to help data scientists get noticed, promoted, and valued. No theory — just practical steps to transform your technical expertise into business impact and the freedom to call your own shots.
Earlier this year, entrepreneur Mark Cuban posted the following on X: “There are generally two types of LLM users: those that use it to learn everything, and those that use it so they don’t have to learn anything.” As this quote suggests, AI has the potential to dramatically expand what data scientists can do. But used without care, it also has the potential to quietly erode the expertise that makes them valuable in the first place. Given my expertise took over 20 years for me to build, I’ve...
A few years back, when ChatGPT was in its infancy, stories relating to AI hallucination-induced mishaps made the news on pretty much a daily basis. From lawyers filing briefs referencing non-existent cases to government reports riddled with fake citations, you could watch people learning the limitations of AI in real time. And no organisation was too big to avoid embarrassment. Although these incidents do still occur, people are now at least starting to become aware of the very real...
Each week, it seems like there’s yet another announcement of technical workers losing their jobs to AI. In Australia, for example, tech giant Atlassian recently laid off 1,600 workers - 10% of their global workforce - “to steer more spending into AI”. Now, granted, not every AI-related job loss is necessarily as it first appears. Some experts point to AI-washing. That is, companies using AI as cover for restructuring decisions they would have made anyway. But regardless of the reason, the...